Steve jobs biography pdf in gujarati recipes. He swamcompetitively, but was not interested in team sports or other groupactivities. Hespent a lot of time working in the garage workshop of a neighbor whoworked at Hewlett-Packard, an electronics manufacturer.Jobs also enrolled in the Hewlett-Packard Explorer Club. This is because asubstance called silicon is used in the manufacturing of electronicparts.As a child, Jobs preferred doing things by himself. He showed an early interest in electronics and gadgetry.

1. Dvblink Wmc
2. Iptvserver

Contents.General What is DVBLink?DVBLink is a software package that turns your Windows system or NAS into a Personal Video Recorder (PVR). DVBLink records all your favorite TV programs directly to the hard disk of a NAS or Windows PC and distributes live and recorded TV content to a variety of clients on your home network.What is a typical DVBLink installation consists of?Typical DVBLink installation consists of:. a host system: Windows PC, NAS or Raspberry Pi. DVBLink Server software package, running on a host system. DVBLink Server is a core free component of DVBLink product suit and acts as installer for other DVBLink products. DVBLink TV signal source product (DVBLink TVSource, DVBLink for IPTV etc.

The stats for the Hammerhead II chip (I need to find out if Hammerhead is II on the Infineon chip)The chip was co designed with Global Locate. Where did they go?

Got acquired by Broadcomm, which is creating the rival baseband SoC chip to Infineons. (the chip is now the BCM4750) (Other options include the SiRFstarIII).The Hammerhead II chip is optimized for mobile devices requiring high performance, low power and an extremely small footprint.

The diminutive single-die chip measures only 3.7mm x 3.6mm x 0.6 mm, for a total footprint of less than 14 mm², resulting in the world’s smallest GPS receiver.Cost £5 a chip in quantity (or less).' The GPS feature can now be added to any mobile device with a total electronics bill-of-materials footprint of less than 50 mm².

It can deliver sensitivity to -160 dBm and position fix times as fast as 1 second.The Nokia N95 has A-GPS. But bear in mind sporting equipment - e.g. The Forerunner 305 - It could take 30 sec to several minutes getting a lock. This might kick it's ass.Bluetooth Heart Rate monitor - and bang, you've got a Forerunner 405 competitor.Could this explain why there have been no announcements or leaks regarding Apple - SatNav company tie ins? If Apple already has A-GPS in it's next chipset, all they'd need was the mapping software (And Google maps could do that (who's to know they haven't been in secret making a personal navigation program?))The Hammerhead II chip is currently available in sampling quantities, with mass-production scheduled for February 2007.

It's in the TomTom One I believe.NB: It's an optional module, not integrated. Thus they could provide it as a differentiator to make a range of iPhones.' Support of connectivity modules such as Bluetooth, WLAN, A-GPS, DVB-H, FM Radio, etc.' IPhone Pro - Now with FM Radio, A-GPS, DVB link to the Apple TV.As another aside - Just reading about the Flip camcorder through tehe David Pogue article -'It has snagged a whopping 13% of the camcorder market.' & It's been the best-selling camcorder on Amazon.com since the day of its debut.' What's going on here? Having finally lived with the Flip, I finally know the answer: it's a blast.

Dvblink Wmc

It's always ready, always with you, always trustworthy. Instead of crippling this 'camcorder,' the simplicity elevates it. Comparisons with a real camcorder are nonsensical, because the Flip is something else altogether: it's the video equivalent of a Kodak point-and-shoot camera.

It's the very definition of 'less is more.' It has TV resolution (640x480 pixels, 30 fps with softer images than you'd get with a real camcorder.)That kind of resolution comes from a forward facing cam on 3G mobiles these days. Linking in to the ooh look what the US has to look forward to once it gets 3G thread.

Speaking from an AT&T 3G users perspective, my phone (Samsung SGH-A707) has always gracefully fallen back to EDGE if I leave 3G range. On top of that my connection speeds are really fast when in 3G areas. I'm really on the fence with this. I really want an iPhone, but I don't want to buy one if a 3G version is coming in the near future.I was in an Apple Store last Friday playing with the iPhone and decided to turn off the WiFi to actually play with the EDGE network. It reminded me of being back in the dial-up days when accessing 'normal' Web pages. My Samsung with Opera Mini could load these pages in about 1/4 of the time.

IPhone-optimized pages worked pretty well, though. It would seem to me that 3G is a must for Japan and some other countries with no EDGE fallback.Like many, I'm hanging on every rumor, but every time I walk into an Apple Store, the chances get better that I will walk out with an iPhone, 3G or not.

Will haptic tech be a differentiator between a new iPhone line up?Immersion Corporation is the company I believe ( I need to recheck) that's helped Samsung announce the SCH-W420 (SPH-W4200) haptic touch-screen phone in South Korea (S. Korea hearts Samsung. Remember the bung stories of old?)Just a thought. Front screen cam, higher cam res, haptic sense.

Any more potential differentiators?In terms of dates, maybe a Apple sized shed load order of touch screens/haptic tech will be leaked sometime? So now there's a rumour from an analyst. 3G is on baby!iPod Observer:'Apple may have ordered a second round of 10 million iPhones based on the 3G network, according to Gartner analyst Ken Dulaney.

Dulaney, who follows the iPhone for the research firm, based that on rumors he's become aware of in Asia.In a phone interview, Mr. Dulaney told the iPod Observer that he believes Apple has ordered a second round, amounting to 10 million more units, based on what he's heard in Asian circles. This is in addition to the ten million first generation iPhones that Apple has said it will sell by the end of 2008.Mr. Dulaney also speculated that that the so-called 3G iPhone will use an Organic Light Emitting Diode (OLED) display in the new iPhone. That would lead to a thinner phone and lower power consumption.It was also surmised by Mr. Dulaney that Apple didn't do as well as it expected in Europe with the 2.7G/EDGE network phone, hence the big movement to the 3G network iPhone.'

Infineon's Earnings calls might be right/tie in with this after all.Pity the page 1 rumour had to use the Front facing iPhone rumour (that was beliieved wrong and erroneous when put up )More as I can findGartner Research & Ken DulaneyGartner was involved in the rather large reversal (though in a way fair reversal) of opinion7/2/2007Question: Is the iPhone enterprise-ready?Dulaney: I think the bottom line is that it is a tremendous innovation on the consumer side. In the business sector there are other issues that come up that need to be investigated. Will work in a business context? It is not considered to be business-ready by us. The security is weak. Their VPN is PPTP, which is outmoded today and vulnerable. Many people go with SSL or IPSec which are much better.

The method of accessing Exchange is pretty rudimentary. It uses IMAP or an Outlook Web access front end to get to Exchange. Most companies do not want to get into email that way. In fact, the Outlook Web access front end most often is encapsulated in something that Apple does not offer support for. Users may have to redirect to the ISP where it synchs up with email. Enterprises will be concerned about that because it puts email in an unsecured location. Also, Apple is making users sign up for an iTunes account.

The question is whether that is something corporations want to do.Question: It sounds like they are paying little attention to the enterprise and bypassing, at least now, a potentially lucrative market.Dulaney: Frankly I will tell you if I was making a phone today I would not give a damn about business because the consumer market is far bigger. If they want to get into enterprise, they have to create a different model with different characteristics. One of the reasons MACs are not accepted is because companies always insist on disaster recovery. If HP goes belly up, they want to be able to go to Dell, etc. They want their phones arrangements to be structured in the same way. There is not that option here.

It's a perennial Achilles' heel for Apple. Corporations like its products, but won't deploy them if they don't feel safe.Question: So what are you telling your clients?Dulaney: What we do is start off with a framework. There are three support levels. One is the platform level. That means when you buy the device and put apps on it, you can do pretty much what you want to do, like on a PC or notebook. Apple is not in that class yet.

The second level is the appliance level. That is narrowed down to email, browsing, telephony, PIM. You need an email gateway to RIM, Good Technology, etc. They have not announced that, but they could probably get into that in the next six months or year. The third level the concierge level.

If, say, a company is forced to support something by the CEO, then they can provide the concierge level. It's like a hotel: You hire people to do the work. It's expensive but they do it for you. Today we say that the iPhone is at the concierge level.I'd say with the SDk they're at Level 1 Question: What does this mean at the practical level?Dulaney: When someone calls IT to get help on iPhone, they should not take that call because it is not something they can take on today. If IT responds it's implied that they are making sure it's secure, manageable, etc. You can't promise that with the iPhone today.Question: What about the future?Dulaney: What we said in the note is that IT should get the device and start to use it.

If it gains appliance level status at some point in time, IT will have to figure out what to do.Question: For it to change levels, would Apple have to take any steps?Dulaney: Apple would have to cooperate to make available tools these companies need to put on their gateways and test. I don't see any scenario where they reach the platform level. They could aim at the appliance level, so we are telling companies to keep abreast.

That means answer questions on how to link to e-mail, etc.Question: What about the iTunes requirement. It seems unlikely businesses would go for that. Do you think Apple would drop it?Dulaney: They might depend on how badly they want to get into the business. They don't tell anyone anything.

What they basically want us to do is try to interpolate facts, and come back to them and enable them to say you're wrong. It makes it difficult when everything is kept so secret. The inclination of humans to speculate, and they can say no, that's wrong.Also: 'That's one reason that Avi Greengart, principal analyst for mobile devices at Current Analysis, also thinks the iPhone won't be a good option for enterprise customers. Apple has said that the iPhone will run on an OS X-based operating system and told Greengart that businesses won't be able to write applications for the phone, he said. 'Companies like to extend corporate apps to the mobile space and in order to do that you need an open OS,' he said.

Mobile operating system developers like Windows, Symbian and BlackBerry enable third parties to write applications based on their software.' My main comment is on the Kevin Rose thread. Basically he made a shoddy video, with a clueless companion beside him.He gave no backing, and he was simply reiterating a bland rumour, with no backing. He got the previous generation woefully wrong. Maybe Phil Schiller thought it wise to talk to him.Doesn't really matter, as it's old news anyhowJune shipping, 3G and GPS is feasable, but not necessarily happening.

When the next generation comes out it will definitely have 3G, and i see no reason why one version should not have GPS - As mentioned earlier - the chips cost a few dollars at the most. If you're buying 10 million? You're laughing at the bulk buy cost.GPS isn't a deal breaker anyhow, as said above - if it's not inside, the SDK will sure as hell make it possible for an add on GPS dongle/GPS car charger that has GPS built in to work.What I find interesting is the Nike info on the patent - either Nike have moved away from Apple, or they're still friends - hard to tell as Nike Plus has been mothballed it seems. As speculated before, we could easily see Bluetooth Heart rate monitors to link in with a sport app through the iPhone - clearly Apple sees that the iPhone is ok in the gym, and the app potential is large. Choose your music by bpm, have a better version of the Nike Plus running info.as said before, the iPhone now is seeing convergent rivals crop up - it could, with a decent GPS chip, rival the Forerunner or similar - You pop the iPhone in your backpack, and it could record position, or give directions like the Edge by Garmin.

It could have SatNav potential. All sorts of things really.The mark up of the dongle will probably be affected by whether someone can make a low cost app to drive it - the SiRF StarII or Hammerhead chips are cheap as chips and prototypes are knocked up already.So GPS in some form & 3G definitely in the new iPHone, which i'd peg as say 50% ship in June, 25% announce in June, 25% ship July-August time at the moment. I've worked for companies selling multi-thousand dollar items, who left off an LED simply because it added a dollar to the cost at the time. Every penny counts.In other words, just because a chip (say, GPS) costs a tiny amount or not, that's not what matters. What matters to Apple is whether or not they think it will cause enough extra sales.It's the same reason they left off 3G to begin with. They simply figured they could sell enough without it. (Again, if they'd gone with Verizon, the phone would've had a 3G version to start with.).

A quick updateSo- Garner backtracks and clarifies- Bank or America gets up to the prediction plate.- The Commercial Times reports Hon Hai is competing to make the next iPhone (via MarketWatch).Gartner:Gartner - last Thursday: Backtracking on Ken Dulaney's comments reported by the iPod Observer. Bob Hafner, Dulaney's boss disagrees with the original article.Gartner doesn't know whether Apple has actually placed an order but believes it'll have 3G. No big shakes there. However, Gartner DOES expect OLED. (They are seriously cool - think about it - the screen is a vital part ofthe iPhone - so why not pimp it out?)Bank of AmericaApple is expected to launch a high-speed wireless version of iPhone in the second quarter and to produce as many as 8 million in 3Q. (Prediction in a research report about the phone from Bank of America analyst Scott Craig.)'Our latest channel checks point to a significant production build of a 3G iPhone beginning in the month of June after a initial small build in May,' he said in a note to clients.Craig expects production volume to be much higher than his previous estimates. No iPhone 2 announcement3GPossibly 32gb or at least price cut on current modelsMaybe GPS.

Iptvserver

Apple have shown interest with the 'locate me' button, and it doesn't work too great (the crosshair was the size of the city I was in).No redesignNo change to interface3G would allow iPhone users to access the iTunes store away from Wifi connections which gives Apple a bigger market. I think this will coincide with the app store too.TBH I just cant imagine anything big happening for the June release except maybe, maaaybbbe 3G and/or a price cut.

But again, everything's about cost versus sale-ability.So the reason I think they'll have GPS, is because 3G alone won't be enough to make it highly desirable as an upgrade to many people. Neither will an OLED screen. Unless it increases the battery life quite a lot.So they'll need to spice up the offering with GPS or perhaps a forward-facing camera for video calls, or both.Video. Hard to tell. Although ATT offers one-way video calls and incoming TV shows on other phones, I'm not sure they'd love their network being crammed wtih iPhone owners video'ing each otherGoogle is really into location based services.

So they would press for GPS. Plus it probably would give Apple more income due to kickbacks for searches.